rusty said:
Personally I think its one of the better models before they went to the Jan2 & pao fingerboards on later basses.
Cheers
Rusty
First of all, let me say that's an incredible bass and I too want to see close ups of it.
Now, when you say "pao fingerboards" are you referring to the tigerstripe ebony that's standard on the current Thumbs? I know that's a different cut from the tree (not as "choice/select" as the ebony they used before, if I understand correctly), but pao ferro is not an ebony to begin with. It is a Bolivian tree and is known as a "fake" rosewood. This is not what Warwick uses for their fingerboards on the current Thumbs. In fact, tigerstripe ebony can be a very gorgeous wood, with stripe patterns of brown streaks that make it look quite exotic, such as the "tigerboard" on my Corvette Std. fretless. And the fretless tone and "mwah" lives up to every bit of the exotic look!
Now, my Thumb NT is from the year 2000 and it has a beautiful 3-D velvety bubinga pommele body, a bubinga and ovangkol, neck and a wenge fingerboard. Needless to say (though I'll continue to shout it from the rooftops), my Thumb NT has an elegance in tone and feel that surpasses all my other Warwicks. I usually treat a line of basses as if they were my children, not able to pick a favorite, but my Thumb NT excels so much, I can't help but be prouder of it than the rest.
Then again, the others each have a specific application that I could never substitute or replace, so rather than having "a bass for each day," I have a Warwick for each need or call.
Oh, BTW, all my fretted Warwicks have wenge fingerboards and my two fretless' have tigerstripe ebony. I also had a Corvette Std. fretless with macasar ebony, and i find my "tigerboard" one sounds better! :wink: