=The Warwick Streamer Club=

Tv IV Dogs said:
Nice one Andy! That 93 streamer bolt on is an absolue gem, and looks alarmingly like the big 5 string brother of my wonderstick!!!
Click to expand...

We are bass brothers! :D

Tv IV Dogs said:
I've had it eight years now, and I'm still finding myself amazed at the things it does.

Congrats again on finding it, and I hope its as good to you as mine's been to me!
Click to expand...

Man, this bass never ceases to amaze me!
What a tone!

I'm really impressed!
 
just wondering...is there a problem with pics today? i posted some pics yesterday that aren't showing in another post and i'm having problems today as well. also, how do you put more than one pic in a post?

thanks for any help
 
Hallo!

I'd like to get a membership, may I?

Meet my 1992 Streamer Stage I, bought two days ago (his big brother Thumb BO5 was felling lonely :-))... isn't he lovely? The electronics are not original, but I ordered Mec ones right today.

Pico
 

Attachments

  • aut_0027_338.jpg
    aut_0027_338.jpg
    74.2 KB · Views: 1,094
Greetings! I was disconnected a couple of weeks and I am happy to return and chat with you guys!! BTW, I see that the clubs have grown increasingly have shown more and more streamers!! :D
 
I just finished putting new gold hardware (Bridge, knobs, Switchcraft Jack, Dunlop Straplok pins, JAN I, Tuners, Hipshot D-Tuner) on my Blue Stained, AAA, High Polish SSI. It looks gorgeous (better in person than the pic shows):



Bartolini pups with a special passive circuit (Vol - Blend - P Tone - J Tone; Alpha pots; Orange Drop caps) allow for seperate tone cuts on either pup and then blend together for more tonal combos than the average system.

I also went with a brass JAN I, and I LOVE the way it looks and adjusts!



I always wanted a gloss blue bass with gold hardware. This is now my second dream bass come true!
 
@ pico322: that stage 1 is awesome i just love vintage streamers.

@ mark: love what you've done, the barts are going to sound great and that brass nut..... i love them.
 
beautiful bass! but why is the E String tuner a bit more slanted than the rest? is that what the hip shot requires?
 
JHbass said:
beautiful bass! but why is the E String tuner a bit more slanted than the rest? is that what the hip shot requires?
Click to expand...

No. Without the strings on, it was loose and hung that way before I noticed and took the pic... I also don't know what the white spots are on the headstock - they sren't on there in person.
 
I've got some better pics now, with strings on too (High Polish basses are not easy to photograph!):
 
Why the change drakkett? You weren't pleased with how it sounded in it's original setup?

I've always though the Stage I:s are optimal the way they are with MEC:s, but hey, post some sound clips, and maybe you can prove me wrong!
 
The Swedish Owl said:
Why the change drakkett? You weren't pleased with how it sounded in it's original setup?

I've always though the Stage I:s are optimal the way they are with MEC:s, but hey, post some sound clips, and maybe you can prove me wrong!
Click to expand...

Well, the preamp was noisy when engaged, so I could have just replaced that, but I already had the Bartolini J pup and a P pup was cheaper than a new EQ. Then there's the fact that I like passive pups and circuits better than active anyway (personal choice) and finally, Florin is to blame. He came up with the passive separate tone controls for each pup and then blend them on his CS X-BASS. It was such a cool idea, I had to implement it myself and I actually like it! Plus, no batteries...

If I can get some free time this week (probably Wed. before I get a break from the docs), I will try and get some sound clips. Whether or not my setup is "better" I don't know, but I like it better and that's what counts! :wink: :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top