- Joined
- May 5, 2008
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 0
sorry to be a n00b, i did a search but nothing came up.
its been a year+ since i bought the wick and some minor tweak over the mths has totally whacked out the original pro-set up that i send when i 1st bought it and i am now learning to do simple adjustment and set-up.
i am converting to a heavy pick style to finger style on the new recording and has been tweaking it over past mths. i never seems to be able to lower down the string action without buzzing and its still much higher than my other basses, adjusting the just-a-nut and the 4 screws on the bridge to the lowest and yet i can't achieve the low string action as some of the other basses Fender J's and a Yammy 6 stringer.
i did a google search and folks been discussing abt neck relief and bowing the neck to achieve a low action. how much relief/bow should i subject the warwick neck too? or could i achieve the desired effect by just adjusting just-a-nut and bridge height?
its been a year+ since i bought the wick and some minor tweak over the mths has totally whacked out the original pro-set up that i send when i 1st bought it and i am now learning to do simple adjustment and set-up.
i am converting to a heavy pick style to finger style on the new recording and has been tweaking it over past mths. i never seems to be able to lower down the string action without buzzing and its still much higher than my other basses, adjusting the just-a-nut and the 4 screws on the bridge to the lowest and yet i can't achieve the low string action as some of the other basses Fender J's and a Yammy 6 stringer.
i did a google search and folks been discussing abt neck relief and bowing the neck to achieve a low action. how much relief/bow should i subject the warwick neck too? or could i achieve the desired effect by just adjusting just-a-nut and bridge height?
Last edited by a moderator:
