Rediscovering Warwick

Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
13
Reaction score
6
Greetings!

Recently I have returned to playing Warwick exclusively. It all happened when I went to Guitar Center 2 weeks ago and there it was... A 5 string FNA Jazzman on clearance! About 1/2 price! I got the credit and took it home.

It's a 2004 thats been in the store the whole time. After new strings, a setup, and cleaning the gunk off of it it plays and sounds like a dream.

I have owned a 98 Corvette since 2003 but I admit I havent been playing it much lately. Been playing a 96 Sterling and a bass I call the FrankenFender, a collection of Fender/Squire parts. Both a very good basses don't get me wrong, but I didn't realize how much better these Warwicks make my band sound. A much more powerful, warm tone that just fits. Always smooth and never overbearing as the Sterling could be at times.

My drummer asked why I never brought the original Warwick to rehearsals or gigs since i owned it for so long and I honestly don't know. Just played the same basses out of habit I guess...

Oh well, heres a pic of my basses and my practice amp. Excuse the mess.



For some reason, they look much better in person.

Oh BTW... Mike Brown at Dana B Goods is one awesome guy. GC shorted me the trussrod tool, Wax, and straplocks and he took care of business immediately. When I changed strings the JANII fell off and I found out it was broken, He even threw a JAN3 no charge. To top it all off, I really liked the JAN3 nut and enquired about buying one for my 98. Rob Busch sent me one for nothing and I received it in 2 days! Incredible service!
 
Great basses there. Is your 98 a Custom? It has fret inlays...
 
Thanks

No, they are abalone stickers I bought a couple years ago from a company called Fretware. Actually they look great right here. The pic makes them look crooked for some reason. They are not.
 
vlad335 said:
For some reason, they look much better in person.

yeah i kkow what you mean. the worst bass for this is the thumb BO. they are incapable of looking good in photos... :D
 
vlad335 said:
Thanks

No, they are abalone stickers I bought a couple years ago from a company called Fretware. Actually they look great right here. The pic makes them look crooked for some reason. They are not.



That's some good information, they look like true inlays. Both basses are great BTW.
 
Doog said:
vlad335 said:
Thanks

No, they are abalone stickers I bought a couple years ago from a company called Fretware. Actually they look great right here. The pic makes them look crooked for some reason. They are not.



That's some good information, they look like true inlays. Both basses are great BTW.

Thanks!

Unfortunately Fretware is no more. Company had a great product but terrible with customer service.
 
I'm kinda with you here.
I had a Vette 5 back in the day, and while it sounded great, it just wasn't all that much of a joy to play.

I've been playing Modulus exclusively the last year or so, and I just got my 98 Thumb 6 BO this week, and it's great having the variety and from such a high quality and awesome sounding bass.

With this Thumb 6 and my few Quantum 5s, I'll eat that Fender and Sadowsky for lunch anyday, EVERY day! :D
 
Awesome basses mate, love the FNA!!

And yes, Warwick customer service is some of the best around. Getting to know the local distributer is a great idea, they're top people!!
 
Stroud said:
vlad335 said:
For some reason, they look much better in person.

yeah i kkow what you mean. the worst bass for this is the thumb BO. they are incapable of looking good in photos... :D


But I think your Thumb looks gorgeous on photos ;)
 
Stroud said:
vlad335 said:
For some reason, they look much better in person.

yeah i kkow what you mean. the worst bass for this is the thumb BO. they are incapable of looking good in photos... :D

+1

Its impossible to show the natural wood under the red stain on my proline with a camera... but somtimes ill just gaze into it when im playing...
 
Back
Top