BC ASKS FOR OPINIONS: CORVETTE NT VS BOLT ON

Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Anyone out there have experience with Both the Bolt On AND Neck Thru Corvettes? :?:

I'm interested in your take on the Sonic differences, since we're asked about this and the relative value of each.....

Thanx,
BF
 
Heck, I even bought both of mine from you, Beaver!

The biggest difference in my opinion is that the NT (bubinga body version) has far more presence and clarity. It sounds similar to a Thumb NT, but with the punch of humbuckers.

I still love my BO ($$), but it's pretty dark tonally by comparison.
 
EVOLVEBASS said:
Heck, I even bought both of mine from you, Beaver!

The biggest difference in my opinion is that the NT (bubinga body version) has far more presence and clarity. It sounds similar to a Thumb NT, but with the punch of humbuckers.

I still love my BO ($$), but it's pretty dark tonally by comparison.

+10. The NT has a smoother and more balanced sound all over the fretboard and the harmonics ring out for quite a while longer imho. ~M~
 
EVOLVEBASS said:
Heck, I even bought both of mine from you, Beaver!

The biggest difference in my opinion is that the NT (bubinga body version) has far more presence and clarity. It sounds similar to a Thumb NT, but with the punch of humbuckers.

I still love my BO ($$), but it's pretty dark tonally by comparison.

I've only heard the soundclip from bassplayer.tv where Seth demonstrates the NT Corvette. It was a very clear sounding instrument. Back then many people commented how "muddy" the $$ bolt on sounds, so it was a pleasant surprise to hear the Corvette NT. I know, it's just a soundclip, but nevertheless................ :wink:
 
KrisG said:
Sounds like the perfect bass!

It is in my book! :D

I love the tone of the SSII as well, but I'm hooked on the punch of the $$ NT.
 
for me the $$ NT is a far superior bass, tonally, but the bubinga version is way HEAVY!
 
I have tried them both and ended up buying the NT in Bubinga.

The comments about clarity are about the best description you've going to get. I tried the BO and thought it was a really good bass but then tried the NT and was blown away. It has so much more musicality due to the harmonics ringing out clearly on every note all over the fretboard. This does mean that you need to make your playing very clean technically because if you dampen a string anywhere at only one point, you will get harmonics ringing out!

The only other thing I would mention is the sustain, it just goes on and on and on!

I love it!
 
Yeah, but not to forget those really... monster-bass-frequencies.

With my 5-string versions i sometimes really feel like earthquakeing our house. Without being too loud OR the sound becoming muddy.

Absolutley great bass.
 
Perhaps I am being a bit simplistic and redundant but . . . my experience has been:

Neckthrough: smoothness, clarity, and sustain

Bolt-On: aggessive and punchy
 
John88 said:
Perhaps I am being a bit simplistic and redundant but . . . my experience has been:

Neckthrough: smoothness, clarity, and sustain

Bolt-On: aggessive and punchy

Sounds like these two basses should copulate to create the ultimate Corvette !!! :twisted:
 
John88 said:
Perhaps I am being a bit simplistic and redundant but . . . my experience has been:

Neckthrough: smoothness, clarity, and sustain

Bolt-On: aggessive and punchy

Sounds like a pretty good summary to me. Although those humbuckers make the $$ NT plenty aggressive and punchy!!!
 
Yeah, the BO could be described as more aggressive but the NT can be very punchy too. The $$ electrics make it a really versatile package to be fair.
 
Hello Beaver,

Well, you know me and I purchased my first two Warwicks before starting to work for Warwick from you. I've had a chance to actually play every single instrument on the regular production at this time. About those two that you are asking about, here are my thoughts.

Corvette Bolt-On (Corvette Standard):

The solid Bubinga body, combined with the Ovangkol neck gives you a very midrangy bass, but in my opinion it lacks some low end (the stuff that goes below 60Hz). This happens because both of those woods are very hard and dense, therefore they tend to act as traps for some of those frequencies, which is not bad when you are looking for presence in your tone and you need to cut through.

Corvette NT (Bubinga):

There are two versions of the Corvette NT, one of them being made out of Bubinga with a maple neck. This is a whole different deal than the Corvette Standard for a few reasons. The first one being the maple neck, Which doesn't give you a lot of midrange, but gives you very bright highs and focused lows. The Bubinga takes care of the rest. Then there is the Neck-Through construction, which allows the body and the neck to vibrate for a longer time when the strings are plucked, making it have a lot more sustain than the bolt-on version. When it comes to electronics, I consider the $$ NT a lot more versatile than the Corvette Standard, starting off with the two passive humbuckers which will give you an extremely hot output, and you can switch each one independently, allowing for incredible amounts of control. First you choose a basic sound and then you can shape it however you want using the 3-way electronics to kill or boost whichever frequencies you think will make your tone suit the music you are playing.

Corvette NT (Ash):

The Corvette NT's other version has an Ash body, which less dense than Bubinga, therefore allowing for a more open low end (it's not as tight and compressed as the Bubinga version) but for someone that plays hard rock or metal, this is certainly and advantage. Maybe not so much for someone playing funk.

So to finish it off, I think I would say that what happens is basically that the NT is a brighter bass overall with better sustain, while the other one is a little darker.
 
John88 said:
Perhaps I am being a bit simplistic and redundant but . . . my experience has been:

Neckthrough: smoothness, clarity, and sustain

Bolt-On: aggessive and punchy

That is why I prefer my BO $$ 'Vette - the aggressive punchy growl is just right for me! 8)
 
How is the growl factor on the $$ NT? Is it Corvette growly, Thumb growly, Music Man growly, not growly or something else?

I don't think the $$ BO is that growly, but I have not spent too much time on it.
 
In my opinion the $$ NT growls more like a Thumb NT. It's definitely not the $$ BO type of growl without the ovangkol neck, and it's a much cleaner tone, but those humbuckers still have plenty of bite and tons of punch.
 
maddrakkett said:
John88 said:
Perhaps I am being a bit simplistic and redundant but . . . my experience has been:

Neckthrough: smoothness, clarity, and sustain

Bolt-On: aggessive and punchy

That is why I prefer my BO $$ 'Vette - the aggressive punchy growl is just right for me! 8)

Same here, It's perfect for what I play...
 
maddrakkett said:
That is why I prefer my BO $$ 'Vette - the aggressive punchy growl is just right for me! 8)

I absolutely agree. The NT is my main bass, but I dig having the $$ when I need some meaty snarl... :twisted:
 
Back
Top