golem
Philosopher King
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
- Messages
- 3,529
- Reaction score
- 280
.......
to pretty much cut through at all on an ABG, you need to play with a pick
(cue a million responses saying that fingers are louder on ABGs). I'm not
saying that ABGs are acceptable volume-wise, but you can reduce the
damage.
+1 ..... and [paraphrasing you] all you accomplish is to get a bit closer
to that threshold of usefulness, without ever actually reaching it.
The ABG "total loudness package" would be a stiff pick, frets, and those
brass/bronze "acoustic" strings. This stuff is louder, but it also functions
all together to make your bass sound klangy and not really "bass-like".
I'm thimking that one way that might work to get a useful ABG, again
adding 'not-so-bass-like' sound [just to be heard] would be an 8-string
ABG. The octave [or fifth !] strings would reinforce the note choices in
an audible manner, perhaps leading the listener's ear and mind to hear
the bass as well ... a sort symbiosis thing. To keep it as bassy as might
be possible, I spoze the E-string pair could include an octave or a fifth,
the A-string pair would include a fifth cuz an octave-A might be a bit
too high [detracting from bassiness], and the D- and G-pairs would be
unity pairs cuz even on a regular [shidtty] ABG the D & G are audible.
Acoarst, all this is a lotta string tension for a hollow box ax, and the
8-string neck and oversize headstock will put it waaaay outa balance,
but if you don't suffer, then it's not "ART" [right?].
Last edited by a moderator:

