Stuart Zender's troubles with Warwick

schlobodan

Warwick Streamer Specialist
Good Vibe Sponsor
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
4,734
Reaction score
612
that's quite strange, how fast people's opinion changes.

when the SZ signature came out, everyone was drooling over it, and praising the "bass god" SZ.

then, SZ said something on facebook that some didn't want to hear, and people got upset. SZ was a guy that needed money, and stuff like that. he wasn't the bass god anymore, but some kid trying to bash warwick.

now, that they sorted it out somehow, everything is cool again. SZ is the cool bass player again.

just imagine, tm stevens or jonas hellborg have some problems with warwick some day, then norwood fisher would be the only bass god in this forum ;-)
let's hope norwood fisher doesn't get an endorsement.... :lol:

oh, by the way:
in case you speak german, maybe you want to read this.

if this post is inappropriate, feel free to delete it.

I posted this or something referring to it and Greg deleted my post immediatly :)
 

Florin

OG
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
17,893
Reaction score
2,096
Age
49
Schlobodan, Iuserneim, those were pollitical bull♣♣♣♣s, and Warwick was a collateral victim... That's why we don't want to ruin our mood with ♣♣♣♣ty topic. It is a full thread already, with all the opinions, just make a search. No need for more topics about this bull♣♣♣♣.
 

schlobodan

Warwick Streamer Specialist
Good Vibe Sponsor
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
4,734
Reaction score
612
Schlobodan, Iuserneim, those were pollitical bull♣♣♣♣s, and Warwick was a collateral victim... That's why we don't want to ruin our mood with ♣♣♣♣ty topic. It is a full thread already, with all the opinions, just make a search. No need for more topics about this bull♣♣♣♣.

take a breath - relax :)

We love Warwick
 

Mr Praline

Forum Silly Person
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
2,868
Reaction score
89
So can't we have Stu come here with an official statement?
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
10,906
Reaction score
41
Age
57
So can't we have Stu come here with an official statement?


Stu has seen this thread,if he felt the need to respond,he would've.
He's never even posted in the Stu Zender forum,so I cant see why he'd post here.
 

Mr Praline

Forum Silly Person
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
2,868
Reaction score
89
Stu has seen this thread,if he felt the need to respond,he would've.
He's never even posted in the Stu Zender forum,so I cant see why he'd post here.

Ah, I see, thanks for clearing that up!
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
658
Reaction score
1
I posted this or something referring to it and Greg deleted my post immediatly :)

of course, schlobodan, because you should have posted it in the political bull♣♣♣♣ forum, not in the warwick forum
:lol:

warwick is the victim !
 

Florin

OG
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
17,893
Reaction score
2,096
Age
49
Iuserneim, this is the topic:


If you think there is something you might add which has not been said, I will open it again. If not, please, ... You don't need to mention it on every topic, there is one already.

Cheers!
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
658
Reaction score
1
man, i really didn't notice that in this forum people are only allowed to talk about pro-warwick stuff. as soon as it could put a wrong complexion on the company, it's not funny anymore.

was it ok to say that in this topic ?
really, i don't want to sound like i'm argumentative, but i think it's not ok to forbit the forum members to speak.
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2019
Messages
5
Reaction score
11
Age
25
It's quite funny seeing people jump to conclusions everywhere. If Stuart got lowballed un-fairly, then I 100% take his side. Facebook or not, it would be a dick move to do him that way. If he did indeed sign a specific contract and that Warwick respected the contract, then ofc it's on him. But the only thing people are doing here is speculating, completely useless...
 

Hardy

Good Vibe Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
6,466
Reaction score
7,347
It's quite funny seeing people jump to conclusions everywhere. If Stuart got lowballed un-fairly, then I 100% take his side. Facebook or not, it would be a dick move to do him that way. If he did indeed sign a specific contract and that Warwick respected the contract, then ofc it's on him. But the only thing people are doing here is speculating, completely useless...

Hi Jeremy! This thread is 10 years old. Greetz!
 

Hoggles

Good Vibe Sponsor
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
2,208
Reaction score
1,928
giphy.gif
 
Top Bottom